Thursday, 15 November 2012

LP Level 3: Six techniques to accomidate learning styles


Six techniques to accommodate learning styles.

1. Redesign the room.
2. Use small-group techniques or circle of knowledge.
3. Define clearly what learners need to learn.
4. Use multi sensory resources.
5. Use at least three small group techniques.
6. Develop activities through which information can be used creatively.

Zulu translation:

Amasu Six ukuze ukwamukela izitayela yokufunda. 
1. Redesign igumbi. 
2. Sebenzisa amasu licembu lelincane-noma indilinga kolwazi. 
3. Chaza ngokucacile ukuthi yini bafundzi kumele bafunde. 
4. Sebenzisa izinsiza sezinzwa multi. 
5. Sebenzisa amasu group okungenani ezintathu ezincane. 

6. Ukuthuthukisa imisebenzi lapho ilwazi ingasetshenziswa alawulwa.

For my LP Level 3's : The five principles of learning

Name and explain five principles of learning:
 Readiness
o Able or willing to do and learn.
o Degree of single-mindedness ad eagerness.
o Individuals learn best when they are physically, emotionally and
mentally ready to learn.
o Example: Bobby is not emotionally ready. Bobby is physically
smaller than the other children.
Exercise
o Practise.
o Things most often repeated are best remembered.
o Example: Bobby still gets the work wrong even though he has to
repeat it.
Effect
o A change produced by an action.
o Learning is strengthened when accompanied by a pleasant or
satisfying experience/feeling.
o Example: Bobby doesn't find Grade 1 fun.
Primacy
o The state of being first.
o Things learned first create a strong impression and are difficult to
erase and easy to remember.
o Example: None
Recency
o Not much time has passed.
o Things most recently learned are best remembered.
o Information acquired last it remembered best.
o Example: None
Intensity
o Very strong experience has a strong result.
o The more intense the material taught the more likely it is to be
retained/remembered.
o Exciting learning experiences teach more than a boring experience.
o Example: Bobby doesn't find it fun therefore he won't learn.



Rough Zulu translation: 
Yisho futhi uchaze izimiso ezinhlanu zokufunda: Ukuzimisela 
o Able noma abazimisele ukukwenza futhi bafunde. 
o Degree of nokugxila ad ukulangazelela. 
kubantu bafundza kahle uma ngokomzimba, ngokomzwelo futhi 
sikulungele ngokwengqondo ukuze ufunde. 
o Isibonelo: Bobby ayiwona isilungele ngokomzwelo. Bobby kuyinto ngokomzimba 
zincane ukwedlula lezi ezinye izingane. 
Ukuzivocavoca 
o etayete. 
o Izinto ezivamise zigcwele arcade ukukhunjulwa. 
o Isibonelo: Bobby namanje uthola umsebenzi ezingafanele ngisho noma kufanele 
phinda it. 
effect 
o A ushintsho ekhiqizwa isenzo. 
o Ukufunda siyaqina lapho sihambisana a mnandi noma 
ezigculisayo isipiliyoni / umuzwa. 
o Isibonelo: Bobby singakutholi Grade 1 fun. 
igunya 
o Uhulumeni wokuba kuqala. 
o Izinto wafunda kuqala Ukwakha umqondo oqinile futhi kunzima 
ukusula futhi kulula ukukhumbula. 
o Isibonelo: Akukho 
Okwamuva 
o Not isikhathi esiningi sekudlule. 
o Izinto iningi usanda wafunda kungcono ukukhunjulwa. 
o Ulwazi aluthola last it wakhumbula best. 
o Isibonelo: Akukho 
amandla 
o isipiliyoni oqinile kakhulu unalo Chile oqinile. 
o I okukhulu ngaphezulu indaba wafundisa amaningi okuthi kungenzeka ukuba kube 
ezigciniwe / bakhumbula. 
o nakho yokufunda Akumnandi bafundisa kuka nakho isidina. 

o Isibonelo: Bobby ayifuni bakuthola fun ngakho-ke ngeke afunde.

Wednesday, 14 November 2012

LP Level 3: Steps of ethical decision making

Dear Level 3 LP students,

Find below the 10 steps to ethical decision making. This is a question that they normally love to ask, but that we do not explicitly learn. They might ask this in a form of scenario analyses or just to list them. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ORDER IS IMPORTANT!

List the steps for ethical decision-making:

1. What are the facts?

2. Identify and define the ethical problem.

3. Who is involved in the decision?

4. What vales are at stake in the decision?

5. What options are available to resolve this dilemma?

6. Which options are the most compelling?

7. How would you resolve the dilemma?

8. What values did you rely on to make your decision?

9. What consequences will your decision have on others involved?

10. Could you personally live with this decision?

Please make sure that you know this!
Best regards,
Mr. Keyser

Rough Zulu translation: 
Level Othandekayo 3 LP abafundi, 
Thola ngezansi amagadango 10 kuya nezimiso zokuziphatha izinqumo. Lona umbuzo ngokuvamile athande ukubuza, kodwa ukuthi singazi ngokucacile ufunde. Bangase babuze lokhu oluthile simo analysis noma nje ukuze zibhale. Sicela wazi ukuthi UKUZE KUBALULEKILE! 
Bhala izinyathelo for izinqumo zokuziphatha okufanele: 
1. Athini amaqiniso? 
2. Thola bese ichaze inkinga sokuziphatha. 
3. Ngubani okuhilelekile sinqumo? 
4. Imithetho kusengozini in sinqumo? 
5. Imiphi ongakhetha ayatholakala ukuze sedlule kulokhu? 
6. Yimuphi ongakhetha yizona esibaluleke kakhulu? 
7. Ungayichaza kanjani le inkinga? 
8. Imithetho wena u bathembele yokwenza isinqumo sakho? 
9. Yimiphi imiphumela isinqumo sakho kwabanye abathintekayo? 
10. Kungenzeka yini wena uphile nale sinqumo? 
Sicela uqinisekise ukuthi okwaziyo lokhu! 
Ozithobayo, 

Mnu Keyser

L.P Level 3: Nature vs Nurture

Dear Level 3's
I know some of you still have difficulties regarding nature and nurture. Let me try and help make it easier for you to understand.

Nature:
Nature is those traits (things) that have been passed on to you from birth through your parents. In other words, it refers to the fact that genetically you are a 50/50 combination of your mother and your father. These traits cannot be changed and is part of you for the rest of your life. When asked then what is nature the words that you need to keep in mind is: Nature is those things that you inherit from your parents through their genes (DNA) that you cannot change and that is with you for the rest of your life, for example: your height, your eye color etc. The other important implication (consequence) of genes are that you have predispositions (a knack or talent for) certain things, for example: Both your parents are mathematicians and therefore there is a good chance that you will also make a talent for doing math, Or: Your mother is a great writer and therefore there is a bigger chance that you will also be good with words in comparison to your friend whose parents are not good with language. Nature explains behaviors and talents that one has had since birth and that the individual did not have to learn from another person. However, if there is not the right social environment (i.e. the child lives in poverty or does not have access to proper schooling) their inherited talents will not develop to its fullest. This is where nurture is important.

Nurture:
Nurture refers to behaviors and ways of thinking that the individual has learned form other people, starting with the people closest to them i.e. their family. It is then socially learned behavior that the individual acquires (gains) over time from observing, questioning etc. the people who are in their lives and is therefore also influenced by socio economic factors such as where a person grew-up. For example: If you grew up in a very rich community it is unlikely that you will have met or be friend with gangsters (and all the types of criminal behavior that you would learn from such a person) and so the chances are far less that you will become one in comparison to another person who grew up in a very poor community. Nor would you have reasons to become a gangster since your basic needs would be taken care of.

The difference then of nurture:
In comparison to nature, nurture (socially learned behavior) is learned over time (i.e. not genetic and from birth as is the case in nature) and can also change over time as one moves through different social groups. However, as I have mentioned, if you are not in the right environment then your talents (genetic predispositions) will not be able to develop to its fullest as a result of environmental factors such as poor nutrition, socio economic level, poor education standards etc.

An example of what the above means can be explained with twins who are not identical and twins who are identical: 




See Also: 
As well as: http://video.about.com/genealogy/What-Is-Nature-Vs--Nurture-.htm

I hope this helps a little. If you have any other questions please feel free to leave a comment so I may help you.
Best regards,
Mr. Keyser

Rough Zulu translation:

Dear Level 3 luka 
Ngiyazi abanye benu kusadingeka nobunzima mayelana nemvelo bese sikhulisa. Ake ngizame futhi ngisize zenza kube lula kuwena ukuqonda. 

Nature: 
Imvelo kuyinto lezo zici (zinto) eziye badlula kini kusukela ekuzalweni ngokusebenzisa abazali bakho. Ngamanye amazwi, lokhu kusho yokuthi zofuzo wena 50/50 ukuhlanganiswa umama wakho nobaba wakho. Lezi zimfanelo ayikwazi ukushintshwa futhi ingxenye lwakho ukuphila kwakho. Lapho ebuzwa ukuthi ke siyini isimo amazwi kudingeka ukukhumbula: Imvelo lezo izinto ifa kubazali bakho ngokusebenzisa zofuzo zabo (DNA) ukuthi ngeke kushintshe futhi nawe ukuze uthole ukuphila yakho, ngokuba isibonelo: ubude bakho, umbala wakho iso njll Omunye umtselela ezibalulekile (umphumela) of zofuzo kangakanani ngokuthi une predispositions (lokulungisa noma ithalente for) izinto ezithile, isibonelo: Bobabili abazali bakho zezibalo ngakhoke kungenzeka kuvele amahle nawe uyoyiphilisa nekhono ngokwenza izibalo, Noma: umama wakho umbhali enkulu, ngakho-ke kukhona ithuba ezinkulu ukuthi ngeke ibuye ibe okuhle ngamazwi uma eqhathaniswa nomngani wakho enabazali akuzona obuhle limi. Imvelo ichaza ukuziphatha kanye amathalente one awuqala azalwa nokuthi umuntu engenawo bafundze omunye umuntu. Nokho, uma kungekho nethonya lomphakathi right (ie ingane ihlala ubumpofu noma engenzi ukufinyelela esikoleni efanele) amakhono abo ngofuzo ngeke ukuthuthukisa ukuba afike ekugcineni yayo. Lokhu kulapho ukunakekelwa kubalulekile. 

bakhuthaza
Bazakhele ubhekisela ukuziphatha nezindlela ecabanga ukuthi lowo muntu uye wafunda olunye uhlobo abantu, kusukela abantu abaseduze nabo okusho emndenini wabo. It is emphakathini ke ngafunda ukuziphatha le litholwa ngamanye (izinzuzo) phezu kwesikhathi ngokubuka, ukungabaza njll abantu abakhuluphele ezimpilweni zabo bese sibuye yalokho ukuthonywa kwezenhlalo nezomnotho nezici njengokuthi umuntu lakhula-up. Isibonelo: Uma usukhulile emphakathini ocebile kakhulu cishe uyobe wahlangana noma abe umngane ne gangsters (futhi zonke izinhlobo zokuziphatha criminal ukuthi uyobe sifunde umuntu onjalo) ngakho Mancane kancane kude ukuthi uzoba eyodwa uma eqhathaniswa komunye umuntu owakhulela umphakathi esibi kakhulu. Nor ubungabufaka izizathu ukuba abe gangster kusukela nezidingo zakho eziyisisekelo bekuyoba zinakekelwe. 

Umehluko ke of ukunakekelwa: 
Uma eqhathaniswa nemvelo, ukunakekelwa (ukuziphatha wafunda emphakathini) kufundwa phezu kwesikhathi (okusho hhayi zofuzo kanye kusukela ekuzalweni njengoba kunjalo endalweni) kanti ungaba futhi ishintshe ngokuhamba kwesikhathi njengoba esisodwa eshayela phakathi kwamaqembu ahlukene yezenhlalo. Nokho, njengoba ngiyinikele okukhulunywa, uma ungekho imvelo right ke amakhono akho (predispositions zofuzo) ngeke akwazi ukuthuthukisa ukuba afike ekugcineni yayo ngenxa zici kwemvelo ezifana ukungondleki kahle, level kwezomnotho kwezenhlalo, abampofu amazinga ezemfundo njll .

Tuesday, 13 November 2012

Lp Level 3: Ethics, values and beliefs.

Dear level 3 LP students:
I have received a question regarding ethics, values and beliefs. Now to answer this question in not too much detail let me break each one down to its essentials:

Values are 'things' (thoughts and behaviors) that we hold as valuable to ourselves. Examples of this would be loyalty between friends or in the work context producing quality work.

Beliefs are those thoughts and behaviors that we accept without questioning it to be true. In other words a belief is a view on life that you take for granted, i.e. without question. An example of this would be the belief in heaven, of the belief that children are innocent. This includes, but is not limited to your religion.  

Ethics on the other hand is not like the other two in that it is not something that is dear (close) to you or that you accept without question, but rather it is a method or a system of thinking you use to decide whether or not an action or a thought is right or wrong. To come to the final choice of right or wrong, you make use of your values and beliefs to inform your decision. If you value your friends’ loyalty more than honesty, then your ethical decision will reflect this. However, if according to your belief it is wrong to lie and that is more important than your friends' loyalty then again your system of ethical decision making will be more influenced by your belief. View ethics then as the scale that weighs your values and beliefs to help you come to the most appropriate answer for the given problem that has occurred. 

I hope this will help you to some extent, but whether or not you learn for the exam is an ethical decision that only you can make. 

Best regards, 
Mr. Keyser  

Rough Zulu translation:

3 LP abafundi level Othandekayo: 
Ngithole umbuzo mayelana nokuziphatha, amagugu kanye nezinkolelo. Manje ukuphendula lo mbuzo ngokuningiliziwe kungabi kuningi ngicela aphambane yilowo nalowo phansi kuya essentials bayo: 

Izindinganiso kukhona 'izinto' (imicabango ukuziphatha) ukuthi thina sibambelele ziyigugu ngokwethu. Izibonelo zalokhu bekuyoba ukwethembeka phakathi kwabangane noma kuyi umongo emsebenzini ukukhiqiza umsebenzi quality. 

Izinkolelo yilawo imicabango ukuziphatha siyakwamukela ngaphandle singabaze ukuthi uqinisile. Ngamanye amazwi i-nkolelo nombono ngokuphila ukuthi uthatha kalula, okungukuthi ngaphandle umbuzo. Isibonelo salokhu kwakuyoba inkolelo ezulwini, we-inkolelo yokuthi izingane ezingenacala. Lokhu kufaka, kepha akupheleli enkolweni yakho. 

Izimiso zokuhle ngakolunye uhlangothi akafani elinye ezimbili kuleyo akusikho into ayithandayo (close) kuwe noma ukuthi wamukela ngaphandle umbuzo, kodwa kunalokho kuba indlela noma isimiso lokucabanga usebenzisa anqume ukuthi noma cha isenzo noma umcabango okulungile noma okungalungile. Ukuze eze ekukhetheni lokugcina okulungile noma okungalungile, wenza ukusetshenziswa izindinganiso nezinkolelo ukwazisa isinqumo sakho. Uma uyayazisa ukwethembeka abangane bakho kuka ukwethembeka ke isinqumo sakho nezimiso zokuziphatha izoba zibonise lokhu. Nokho, uma ngokusho inkolelo yakho akulungile ukuqamba amanga nokuthi kubaluleke ngaphezu kwanoma ukwethembeka abangane bakho ke aphinde uhlelo lwakho of nezimiso zokuziphatha izinqumo uzobe more ukuthonywa inkolelo yakho. Buka izimiso zokuhle ke njengoba esikalini ukuthi nesisindo izindinganiso nezinkolelo ukukusiza eze impendulo ezifanele kakhulu inkinga kulokho okuye kwenzeka. 

Ngethemba lokhu kuyokusiza ukuba elithile, kodwa noma ngabe ufunda for ukuhlolwa kuyisinqumo zokuziphatha kuphela ungenza. 

Ozithobayo, 
Mnu Keyser

Monday, 12 November 2012

Social Ecological Theory

Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Theory holds that 'development' is influenced by several environmental systems. The theory identifies five environmental systems. The five environmental systems are:
  • "Microsystem: This refers to the immediate surroundings of the individual. These contexts include the person's family, peers, school, and neighborhood. It is in the microsystem that the most direct interactions with social agents take place; with parents, peers, and teachers, for example. The individual is not merely a passive recipient of experiences in these settings, but someone who actually helps to construct the social settings.
  • Mesosystem: This refers to the relations between the different  microsystems or connections between contexts. Some common examples are the connection between family experiences and school experiences, school experiences to church experiences, and family experiences to peer experiences. For example, children whose parents have rejected them may have difficulty developing positive relations with their friends or peers.
  • Exosystem: Is concerned with the connection between a social setting in which the individual does not have an active role and the individual's immediate context. For example, a wife's or child's experience at home may be influenced by the husband's experiences at work. The father  might receive a promotion that requires more travel, which might increase conflict with the wife  and affect patterns of interaction with the child.
  • Macrosystem: Describes the culture in which individuals live. Culture meaning the ways of people. Cultural contexts would include socioeconomic status, poverty, and ethnicity.
  • Chronosystem: Refers to the patterning of environmental events and transitions over the life of an individual as well as sociohistorical circumstances. For example, divorce is one transition. Researchers have found that the negative effects of divorce on children often peak in the first year after the divorce. Two years after the divorce, family interaction is less chaotic and more stable. An example of sociohistorical circumstances, would be the increasing opportunities for women to pursue a career.


If we where to then look at is in more detail it would look as follows:

As you can see the child's family and friend are the center pillar that runs though all other aspects of his/her other interactions in society and so too then also the individual development.

The ecological theory is one among the many  different theories related to human development. It emphasizes environmental factors as playing the major role to development. However this theory varies from culture to culture.

(Available from: http://www.enotes.com/soc/q-and-a/can-use-some-help-starting-this-paper-175243/)

U may also want to look at the link attached http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emm63kn0F28

Good luck with you studies.
Regards,
Mr. Keyser

Rough Zulu translation:
Bronfenbrenner sika Ecological Theory uthi 'ukuthuthukiswa' kuthonywa izinhlelo eziningana kwemvelo. Imfundiso ikhomba izinhlelo emihlanu kwemvelo. I izinhlelo eziyisihlanu zemvelo:

  • "Microsystem: Lokhu kubhekisela indawo eziseduze zalowo muntu Lezi Umongo zihlanganisa umndeni lo muntu, ontanga, esikolweni, begodu endaweni Kungenxa ku microsystem ukuthi ubudlelwano ngqo kakhulu agents social zenzeke, nabazali, ontanga nothisha.. , isibonelo. umuntu akuyona nje umemukeli yokwenziwa of nakho kulezi izilungiselelo, kepha umuntu empeleni usiza ukwakha izinhlelo senhlalo. 
  • Mesosystem: Lokhu kusho ukusebenzisa ubudlelwane phakathi kwe Microsystems ezahlukene noma ukuxhumana phakathi kuka ezimweni. Ezinye izibonelo yilezi ezivame ukuhlobana nakho umndeni kanye nakho yesikole, nakho esikoleni nakho esontweni, futhi nakho umndeni ukubona nakho. Ngokwesibonelo, izingane ezinabazali wasilahla angase abe nobunzima okhulayo nobudlelwane emihle nabangane babo noma nontanga. 
  • Exosystem: Ingabe ukhathazekile nge ukuhlobana ebudlelwaneni obuthile lapho lowo muntu akanayo indima esebenzayo kanye nesimongcondvo yomuntu ngokushesha. Isibonelo angase, sithonywe a noma isipiliyoni bengane ekhaya unkosikazi by nakho abasemzini usebenza. Ubaba ingase yamukelwe ukukhuthazwa ukuthi kudinga travel xaxa, okuyinto engase andise ezingqubuzana lowo mfazi kuthinta indlela nokuxhumana ingane. 
  • Macrosystem: Chaza isiko lapho ngabanye baphile. Namasiko okusho izindlela zabantu. Zenhlalo yamasiko kuhlanganisa isimo inhlalo yabantu nezomnotho wabo, ububha, kanye nobuhlanga. 
  • Chronosystem: Kushiwo silingise ngezehlakalo kwemvelo kanye ukuhwebelana phezu empilweni umuntu kanye nezimo sociohistorical. Ngokwesibonelo, isehlukaniso eyodwa inguqulelo. Abacwaningi bathole ukuthi imiphumela emibi yesehlukaniso on izingane zivame Eliphakeme ngonyaka wokuqala ngemva kwesehlukaniso. Emva kweminyaka emibili isehlukaniso, ukuxhumana komkhaya mancane senhlekelele kanye okuvamile. Isibonelo izimo sociohistorical, kwakuyoba amathuba esikhulayo abesifazane ukwenza i-career. 


Uma senza kuphi ke sibheke is kabanzi ukuthi bekungaba zibukeke kanje:

Njengoba ubona umndeni wengane kanye nomngane kuyindawo insika centre eyehlayo Nokho zonke ezinye izici zakhe / nezinye ubudlelwano bayo emphakathini nokunye khulu ke nako intuthuko ngamanye.

Imfundiso semvelo ngenye phakathi imibono eminingi ehlukene oluphathelene nokuthuthukisa womuntu. It ugcizelela nezici kwezemvelo njengoba idlala indima enkulu ekuthuthukisweni. Nokho lokhu theory lihlukile isiko emasikweni.

(Kuyatholakala kusuka: http://www.enotes.com/soc/q-and-a/can-use-some-help-starting-this-paper-175243/)

U kungase ufune ukubheka ukuxhumana enamathiselwe http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emm63kn0F28

Inhlanhla nani izifundo.
Mayelana-
Mnu Keyser

Thursday, 8 November 2012

Cognitive theory


Dear Lp Students:
Below is an in-depth description of Cognitive theory, including how is differs from other theories, what its implications are on education and examples. Please, if you have difficulty with this theory have a look at hits and go the too website for further information.
Piaget's Theory Differs From Others In Several Ways:
o It is concerned with children, rather than all learners.
o It focuses on development, rather than learning per se, so it does not address learning of information or specific behaviors.
o It proposes discrete stages of development, marked by qualitative differences, rather than a gradual increase in number and complexity of behaviors, concepts, ideas, etc.
The goal of the theory is to explain the mechanisms and processes by which the infant, and then the child, develops into an individual who can reason and think using hypotheses. 
To Piaget, cognitive development was a progressive reorganization of mental processes as a result of biological maturation and enviromental experience. Children construct an understanding of the world around them, then experience discrepancies between what they already know and what they discover in their environment.
There Are Three Basic Components To Piaget's Cognitive Theory:


  1. Schemas
  2. (building blocks of knowledge)


  3. Processes that enable the transition from one stage to another (equilibrium, assimilation and  accommodation)

  4. Stages of  Development:

  • sensorimotor,
  • preoperational,
  • concrete operational,
  • formal operational

Schemas



Piaget called the schema the basic building block of intelligent behavior – a way of organizing knowledge. Indeed, it is useful to think of schemas as “units” of knowledge, each relating to one aspect of the world, including objects, actions and abstract (i.e. theoretical) concepts.
When a child's existing schemas are capable of explaining what it can perceive around it, it is said to be in a state of equilibrium, i.e. a state of cognitive (i.e. mental) balance.
Piaget emphasized the importance of schemas in cognitive development, and described how they were developed or acquired. A schema can be defined as a set of linked mental representations of the world, which we use both to understand and to respond to situations. The assumption is that we store these mental representations and apply them when needed.
For example, a person might have a schema about buying a meal in a restaurant. The schema is a stored form of the pattern of behavior which includes looking at a menu, ordering food, eating it and paying the bill. This is an example of a type of schema called a 'script'.
Whenever they are in a restaurant, they retrieve this schema from memory and apply it to the situation. The schemas Piaget described tend to be simpler than this - especially those used by infants. He described how - as a child gets older - his or her schemas become more numerous and elaborate.

Piaget believed that newborn babies have some innate schemas - even before they have had much opportunity to experience the world.  These neonatal schemas are the cognitive structures underlying innate reflexes. These reflexes are genetically programmed into us.
For example babies have a sucking reflex, which is triggered by something touching the baby's lips.  A baby will suck a nipple, a comforter (dummy), or a person's finger.  Piaget therefore assumed that the baby has a 'sucking schema'.  Similarly the grasping reflex which is elicited when something touches the palm of a baby's hand, or the rooting reflex, in which a baby will turn its head towards something which touches its cheek, were assumed to result operations: for example shaking a rattle would be the combination of two schemas, grasping and shaking.

Assimilation and Accommodation


Jean Piaget viewed intellectual growth as a process of adaptation (adjustment) to the world. This happens through:
  • Assimilation

    – Which is using an existing schema to deal with a new object or situation.
  • Accommodation

    – This happens when the existing schema (knowledge) does not work, and needs to be changed to deal with a new object or situation.
  • Equilibration

    – This is the force, which moves development along. Piaget believed that cognitive development did not progress at a steady rate, but rather in leaps and bounds.   Equilibrium is occurs when a child's schemas can deal with most new information through assimilation. However, an unpleasant state of disequilibrium occurs when new information cannot be fitted into existing schemas (assimilation).
    Equilibration is the force which drives the learning process as we do not like to be frustrated and will seek to restore balance by mastering the new challenge (accommodation). Once the new information is acquired the process of assimilation with the new schema will continue until the next time we need to make an adjustment to it.

Example of Assimilation


A 2 year old child sees a man who is bald on top of his head and has long frizzy hair on the sides. To his father’s horror, the toddler shouts “Clown, clown” (Sigler et al., 2003).

Example of Accommodation


In the “clown” incident, the boy’s father explained to his son that the man was not a clown and that even though his hair was like a clown’s, he wasn’t wearing a funny costume and wasn’t doing silly things to make people laugh
With this new knowledge, the boy was able to change his schema of “clown” and make this idea fit better to a standard concept of “clown”.

Stages of Development


A child's cognitive development is about a child developing or constructing a mental model of the world.
Imagine what it would be like if you did not have a mental model of your world.  It would mean that you would not be able to make so much use of information from your past experience, or to plan future actions.
Jean Piaget was interested both in how children learnt and in how they thought.
Piaget studied children from infancy to adolescence, and carried out many of his own investigations using his three children. He used the following research methods:
Naturalistic observation: Piaget made careful, detailed observations of children. These were mainly his own children and the children of friends. From these he wrote diary descriptions charting their development.
Clinical interviews and observations of older children who were able to understand questions and hold conversations.
Piaget believed that children think differently than adults and stated they go through 4 universal stages of cognitive development.  Development is therefore biologically based and changes as the child matures.  Cognition therefore develops in all children in the same sequence of stages.
Each child goes through the stages in the same order, and no stage can be missed out - although some individuals may never attain the later stages. There are individual differences in the rate at which children progress through stages.
Piaget did not claim that a particular stage was reached at a certain age - although descriptions of the stages often include an indication of the age at which the average child would reach each stage. Piaget believed that these stages are universal - i.e. that the same sequence of development occurs in children all over the world, whatever their culture.

Educational Implications


Piaget did not explicitly relate his theory to education, although later researchers have explained how features of Piaget's theory can be applied to teaching and learning.
Piaget has been extremely influential in developing educational policy and teaching. For example, a review of primary education by the UK government in 1966 was based strongly on Piaget’s theory. The result of this review led to the publication of the Plowden report (1967).
Discovery learning – the idea that children learn best through doing and actively exploring - was seen as central to the transformation of primary school curriculum.
'The report's recurring themes are individual learning, flexibility in the curriculum, the centrality of play in children's learning, the use of the environment, learning by discovery and the importance of the evaluation of children's progress - teachers should 'not assume that only what is measurable is valuable.'
Because Piaget's theory is based upon biological maturation and stages the notion of 'readiness' important. Readiness concerns when certain information or concepts should be taught. According to Piaget's theory children should not be taught certain concepts until they have reached the appropriate stage cognitive development.
Within the classroom learning should be student centred a accomplished through active discovery learning. The role of the teacher is to facilitate learning, rather than direct tuition. Therefore teachers should encourage the following within the classroom:

o Focus on the process of learning, rather than the end product of it.
o Using active methods that require rediscovering or reconstructing "truths".
o Using collaborative, as well as individual activities (so children can learn from each other).
o Devising situations that present useful problems, and create disequilibrium in the child.
o Evaluate the level of the child's development, so suitable tasks can be set.


Evaluation of Piaget's Theory


Strengths


  • The influence of Piaget’s ideas in developmental psychology has been enormous. He changed how people viewed the child’s world and their methods of studying children. He was an inspiration to many who came after and took up his ideas. Piaget's ideas have generated a huge amount of research which has increased our understanding of cognitive development.
  • His ideas have been of practical use in understanding and communicating with children, particularly in the field of education (Discovery Learning).

Weaknesses


  • Are the stages real? Vygotsky and Bruner would rather not talk about stages at all, preferring to see development as continuous.  Others have queried the age ranges of the stages.  Some studies have shown that progress to the formal operational stage is not guaranteed. For example, Keating (1979) reported that 40-60% of college students fail at formal operation tasks, and Dasen (1994) states that only one-third of adults ever reach the formal operational stage.
  • Because Piaget concentrated on the universal stages of cognitive development and biological maturation, he failed to consider the effect that the social setting and culture may have on cognitive development (re: Vygotsky).
  • Piaget’s methods (observation and clinical interviews) are more open to biased interpretation than other methods, i.e. subjective (Piaget observed alone).
  • As several studies have shown Piaget underestimated the abilities of children because his tests were sometimes confusing or difficult to understand (e.g. Martin Hughes, 1975).
  • The concept of schema is incompatible with the theories of Bruner and Vygotsky. Behaviorism would also refute Piaget’s schema theory.
  • Piaget carried out his studies with a handful of participants – in the early studies he generally used his own children (small / biased sample).

APA Style References

McLeod, S. A. (2009). Jean Piaget | Cognitive Theory. Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html

Rough Zulu translation:
Dear LP Abafundi:
Ngezansi ngokujulile incazelo theory ekubamba kwengcondvo, kuhlanganise indlela kuba sihlukile kweminye imibono, yiziphi ngokusebenza kwawo kukhona on imfundo nezibonelo. Sicela, uma ukuthola kunzima nalesi theory bheka hits uhambe le too website ukuze uthole ulwazi olwengeziwe.
Theory Piaget sika Ehluke Kwabanye ngezindlela eziningi:
o It ikhathazekile nezingane, kunokuthi abafundi wonke.
o Ibhekisisa development, kunokuba ukufunda ngalinye se, ngakho ngeke ukubhekana yokufunda kolwazi noma ukuziphatha ethize.
o It uhlongoza izigaba ngokuqhubekayo yentuthuko, kwabonakala linye qualitative, kunokuba ube ukwanda kancane kancane inombolo nokuba yinkimbinkimbi ukuziphatha, imiqondo, imibono, njll
Umgomo inkolelo-mbono iwukuthi ukuchaza izindlela kanye nezinqubo ngazo usana, bese umntwana, ikhula iba umuntu angakwazi acabange futhi ucabange ngekusebentisa ubunzima.
To Piaget, nentuthuko ephawulekayo wayeyilungu kabusha okuqhubekayo izinqubo kwengqondo ngenxa nokuvuthwa yemvelo kanye nesipiliyoni enviromental. Izingane ukwakha ukuqonda elalibazungezile ke nakho ukungafani phakathi bakuthanda kakade nokuthi bethola kule ndawo.
Zintathu Components Basic To Piaget sika ekubamba kwengcondvo Theory:

Schemas
(ekwakhekeni yolwazi)

Izinqubo ezenza Ukuqeda eyodwa esigabeni kwesinye (equilibrium, nokwenziwa kanye yokuhlala)

Izigaba of Development:
sensorimotor,
preoperational,
ngokhonkolo ukusebenza,
esisemthethweni zokusebenza
Schemas



Piaget esebiza schema the basic isakhi lokuziphatha ohlakaniphile - kuyindlela ukuhlela ulwazi. Ngempela, kuyokusiza ukucabanga schemas njengoba 'Emayunithi' yolwazi, ngamunye eziphathelene isici sezwe, kuhlanganise izinjongo, izenzo kanye abstract (ie theory) imiqondo.
Lapho schemas wengane ekhona bayakwazi echaza nalokho kungaba ukubona bazungeza, it kuthiwa ngo esimweni equilibrium, okusho isimo engqondweni yethu (ie ngokwengqondo) balance.
Piaget wagcizelela ukubaluleka schemas ku nentuthuko ephawulekayo, futhi kuchazwe kanjani njengoba ithuthukiswe noma bathenga. I schema ingachazwa njengenkundla iziphakamiso exhumene ngengqondo zomhlaba, okuyinto sisebenzisa ukuyiqonda futhi aphendule ezimweni zombili. Umbono uwukuthi sigcina lezi izethulo ngengqondo futhi sizisebenzise kuzo uma sidingeka.
Ngokwesibonelo, umuntu angase abe schema mayelana kokuthenga ukudla esitolo sokudlela. I schema kuwuhlobo elondolozwe we eziholela ekuziphatheni okubandakanya ngibuka menu, iyala ukudla, wadla no okhokhela. Lena isibonelo uhlobo schema ngokuthi 'script'.
Noma nini zingabantu esitolo sokudlela, benza ukubuyisa lokhu schema ngekhanda futhi silisebenzise kuze isimo. I schemas Piaget echazwe avame ukuba lula kunalokho - ikakhulukazi lezo ezisetshenziswa izinsana. Wachaza indlela - njengendlela ekhula - schemas sakhe miningi futhi ophambili.

Piaget wayekholelwa ukuthi izinsana babe ezinye schemas kokuzalwa - ngisho nangaphambi kokuba baye kwadingeka ithuba kuningi ukuzwa jikelele. Lezi schemas ezisanda kubelethwa kukhona izakhiwo engqondweni yethu eziyisisekelo ikhaliphe kokuzalwa. Lezi ikhaliphe izakhi zahlelwa zibe nathi.
Isibonelo babies abe reflex Sucking, lokuyintfo senziwa into ethinta izindebe womntwana. Usana niyoncela a ingono, umduduzi (dummy), noma umunwe womuntu. Ngakho-ke Piaget babecabanga ukuthi umntwana has a 'schema abancela'. Ngokufanayo lo reflex ukuqonda alokhu wamcela lapho into ethinta intende yesandla nomntwana, noma reflex ukhula lwenkohlakalo egcwele, lapho ingane vula ikhanda layo maqondana into okuyinto ethinta esihlathini yayo, wayebhekwa umphumela imisebenzi: ngokwesibonelo shaking a khenqeza bekungaba inhlanganisela ka schemas ezimbili, ukuqonda nokuqondiswa kunyakaze.
Nokwenziwa kanye kuhlala


Jean Piaget ayebheka ukukhula engqondo njengendlela inqubo lithathelwe (ukulungiswa) emhlabeni. Lokhu kwenzeka nge:
nokwenziwa

- Yikuphi usebenzisa i-schema ekhona ukubhekana into entsha noma isimo.
kuhlala

- Lokhu kwenzeka lapho lo schema ekhona (ulwazi) akusebenzi, futhi udinga ukuba ishintshwe ukubhekana into entsha noma isimo.
Equilibration

- Lokhu ungamandla, esishukumisela ukuthuthukiswa kanye. Piaget wayekholelwa ukuthi nentuthuko ephawulekayo engathuthukanga ngesilinganiso engaguquguquki, kodwa kunalokho in intuthuko kanye imingcele. Equilibrium kuba kwenzeka uma schemas kwengane kungaba ukubhekana ngolwazi iningi olusha ngokusebenzisa nokwenziwa ingxenye. Nokho, i-state yobulili disequilibrium kwenzeka lapho ulwazi olusha asikwazi zangena schemas ezikhona (nokwenziwa).
Equilibration ungamandla okuyinto ushayela inqubo yokufunda njengoba Asithandi ukuba ucindezelekile futhi uzofuna ukubuyisela balance nge inkositini inselelo entsha (yokuhlala). Once ulwazi olusha is lalifundwa inqubo nokwenziwa naleli schema omusha kuzoqhubeka kuze kube ngokuzayo kudingeka enze izinguquko kuyona.

Isibonelo nokwenziwa


Ingane oneminyaka 2 ubudala ubona indoda oneminyaka Bald kwekhanda lakhe futhi izinwele frizzy ezinde ezinhlangothini. Ukuze horror kayise, le encane ememeza "Clown, clown" (Sigler et al., 2003).

Isibonelo kuhlala


In the "clown" isigameko, uyise womfana wachazela ngendodana yakhe ukuthi le ndoda wayengumuntu clown hhayi nokuthi nakuba izinwele zakhe sasifana sika clown, hhayi yena eyayigqoke indlela yokugqoka funny futhi awuzange ekwenzeni izinto silly ukuze enze abantu uhleko
With lolu lwazi olusha, umfana wakwazi ashintshe schema kwakhe 'clown "futhi wenze lokhu mbono bamba kangcono umqondo izinga" clown'.

Izigaba of Development


Ukukhula kwengane engqondweni yethu imayelana ingane okhulayo noma ukwakhiwa isibonelo ngengqondo zomhlaba.
Cabanga ukuthi bekuyoba njani ukube awuzange babe isibonelo ngengqondo ezwe lakho. It kungasho ukuthi ngeke ukwazi ukusebenzisa okungaka kolwazi kulokho esidlule, noma ukuhlela izenzo esizayo.
Jean Piaget wayenesithakazelo kokubili indlela izingane zafunda nakuzo ababecabanga kanjani.
Piaget wafunda izingane kusukela esewusana kuya usakhula, futhi kwenziwa nje eminingi kophenyo zakhe siqu besebenzisa izingane zakhe ezintathu. Yena izindlela zocwaningo elandelayo esetshenziswa:
Observation imvelo: Piaget enziwe ngokucophelela saphawula eningiliziwe izingane. Lawa kwakungewona ikakhulu izingane zakhe siqu kanye nezingane lwabangane. Kulezi ebhala idayari izincazelo charting ukuthuthukiswa yabo.
Izingxoxo Clinical nokubona zezingane amadala bakwazi ukuqonda ukuthi imibuzo bese ubamba izingxoxo.
Piaget wayekholelwa ukuthi izingane zicabanga awenzi abadala futhi washo babhekana 4 izigaba jikelele we nentuthuko ephawulekayo. Development Ngakho eziphila asekelwe noshintsho njengoba ingane ikhula. Ngakho-ke Cognition yenzeka yonke izingane ukulandelana ofanayo izigaba.
Ingane ngayinye sidlula ezigabeni ngekulandzelana efanayo, futhi akukho sigaba kungenziwa ngalahlekelwa - nakuba abanye abantu bangase nanini bathole izigaba kamuva. Kunomehluko ngamunye izinga lapho izingane ukuthuthuka ngokusebenzisa izigaba.
Piaget akazange bathi esikhathini esithile safika ezingeni yobudala ethile - nakuba izincazelo ze-izigaba ngokuvamile ahlanganisa okubonisa yobudala lapho umntwana isilinganiso zaziyoba sifinyelele ngasinye sigaba. Piaget wayekholelwa ukuthi lezi izigaba kukhona jikelele - okusho ukuthi ukulandelana efanayo yentuthuko kwenzeka ezinganeni kuwo wonke jikelele, noma yini isiko labo.

lezinyathelo ezemfundo


Piaget akazange ngokucacile isho theory yakhe ukuba imfundo, nakuba abacwaningi kamuva ziye sachaza indlela timphawu theory Piaget sika singasetshenziswa nokufundisa kanye nokufunda.
Piaget ubelokhu abanethonya kakhulu ekuthuthukiseni inchubomgomo kwezemfundo nokufundisa. Ngokwesibonelo, Ukubukeza imfundo aphansi nguhulumeni UK ngo 1966 yayisekelwe kakhulu kwi theory Piaget sika. Umphumela walokhu review kwaholela kushicilelwe umbiko Plowden (1967).
Lokufunda Ukutholwa - umqondo wokuthi izingane bafundza kahle ngokwenza kanye ngenkuthalo bahlola - kwabonakala usekelwe uguquko esikoleni aphansi ikharikhulamu.
'Ezilokhu zivela izingqikithi Umbiko izifunda yokufunda ngabanye, ukushintsha-shintsha kuleli lwezifundo, ukubaluleka umdlalo kwezemfundo lezingane, ukusetshenziswa kwemvelo, ukufunda nge kokutholakala begodu ukubaluleka kokuhlaziywa inqubekelaphambili yezingane - othisha kufanele' Ungacabangi ukuthi kuphela ukuthi yikuphi ulinganiseke kuyigugu. '
Ngoba theory Piaget sika kusekelwe nokuvuthwa begazi nezigaba umqondo 'ukulungela' ebaluleke. Ukulungela ukukhathazeka uma ukwaziswa okuthile noma imiqondo kumele afundiswe. Ngokusho ithiyori abantwana Piaget akufanele bafundiswe imiqondo ethile kuze baye bayofika ezifanele nentuthuko ephawulekayo isigaba.
Ngaphakathi yokufunda ekilasini kumele kube umfundi igxile a lwenzeka active zokufunda ukutholakala. Indima uthisha ukuba lula ekufundeni, kunokuthi yesikole ngqo. Ngakho-ke othisha kumele sikhuthaze okulandelayo ngaphakathi ekilasini:

o Gxila inqubo yokufunda, kunokuthi umkhiqizo ekupheleni kwaso.
o Ukusebenzisa izindlela asebenzayo edinga ukuthola noma ukuvuselela "amaqiniso".
o Ukusebenzisa ngokubambisana, kanye nemisebenzi ngabanye (ngakho izingane angafunda nomunye).
o abaceba izimo eveza izinkinga ewusizo, futhi adale disequilibrium in ingane.
o Linganisa izinga zokuthuthukisa wengane, imisebenzi ezifanele kangaka kungenziwa isethwe.

Kokuhlaziywa Theory Piaget sika


amakhono


Ithonya imibono Piaget ngo-Psychology zokuthuthukisa bekulokhu omkhulu. Washintsha indlela abantu zibhekwa jikelele wengane kanye nezindlela zabo ngifunda izingane. Wayengumuntu i ugqozi abaningi ababeza ngemuva bathatha imibono yakhe. Imibono Piaget iye elakhiwe inani elikhulu locwaningo ebizwa anda ukuqonda kwethu nentuthuko ephawulekayo.
Imibono yakhe zokusetshenziswa esiwusizo ekuqondeni ukuxhumana nezingane, ikakhulukazi emkhakheni wezemfundo (Discovery Learning).
ubuthakathaka


Are the izigaba zangempela? Vygotsky and Bruner elingeke lafuna ukukhuluma ngezigaba nhlobo, wakhetha ukubona ukuthuthukiswa njengoba eqhubekayo. Abanye baye sabuza zibe neminyaka engakanani the izigaba. Ezinye izifundo ziye lwabonisa ukuthi inqubekelaphambili esigabeni zokusebenza ehleliwe asiqinisekiswa. Ngokwesibonelo, Keating (1979) babika ukuthi 40-60% labafundi basekolishi bayahluleka at lokuhlelekile operation imisebenzi, futhi Dasen (1994) uthi kuphela-yesithathu omunye abadala esake ukufinyelela esigabeni tekusebenta esisemthethweni.
Ngoba Piaget wagxila the izigaba jikelele we nentuthuko ephawulekayo kanye nokuvuthwa yemvelo, Akazange acabange ngemiphumela isizinda kwezenhlalo namasiko abangaba nalo ekukhuleni engqondweni yethu (re: Vygotsky).
Izindlela Piaget sika (observation and interview zokwelapha) maningi lingachazwa eyayivela kunezinye izindlela, ie subjective (Piaget waphawula wedwa).
Njengoba izifundo eziningana ziye lwabonisa Piaget kancane ngamakhono zezingane ngoba Ulinga zase ngezinye izikhathi edidayo noma kunzima ukuziqonda (isib. Martin Hughes, 1975).
Umqondo we schema akuvumelani the nezimfundiso Bruner and Vygotsky. Behaviorism bekungaba godu ukuphikisa Piaget sika schema theory.
Piaget eyenziwa izifundo zakhe nge nedlanzana iqhaza - in the izifundo ekuqaleni kwawo yena ngokuvamile wayisebenzisa izingane zakhe siqu (encane isampula / sokucwasa).
Apa Style Izinkomba

McLeod, S. A. (2009). Jean Piaget | ekubamba kwengcondvo Theory. Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html


Examples of how scaffolding is used

To all my Level 4 LP students:
Below are some practical examples of how scaffolding is used in the real world context. Hopefully this will help you understand Vygotsky’s theory of Proximal learning.

Current applications of Vygotsky's work


A contemporary application of Vygotsky's theories is "reciprocal teaching", used to improve students' ability to learn from text. In this method, teacher and students collaborate in learning and practicing four key skills: summarizing, questioning, clarifying, and predicting.  The teacher's role in the process is reduced over time.
Also, Vygotsky is relevant to instructional concepts such as "scaffolding" and "apprenticeship", in which a teacher or more advanced peer helps to structure or arrange a task so that a novice can work on it successfully.


Vygotsky's theories also feed into current interest in collaborative learning, suggesting that group members should have different levels of ability so more advanced peers can help less advanced members operate within their zone of proximal development.  (Availbale onnline: http://www.simplypsychology.org/Zone-of-Proximal-Development.html)

Best regards,
Mr.Keyser

Wednesday, 7 November 2012

A link for all my LP students

To all my Lp students who are still struggeling, you can click on the link below:
http://education-portal.com/academy/lesson/classical-conditioning.html

You will also find other LP information on this web page. Please take time to take a look at it.

Best regards,
Mr. Keyser

Friday, 2 November 2012

Operant Conditioning

Dear LP students:
Since I have given you a short definition of classical conditioning I will now also give a definition of operant conditioning:
In Operant conditioning, (unlike in classical conditioning), the goal of the behavior modification is to learn the subject (person or animal) new behavior. Operant conditioning is based on the idea that you wish to increase the frequency i.e. the amount of occasions in a given amount of time that the subject repeats the behavior that you wish it to learn. For instance: The amount of times that your 2 year old tells you they need to go to the toilet in a given week, as appose to the amount of times they forget. The end goal will then be to potty train them.  In other words, you wish to take an chance wanted action and try and get the subject to repeat it over and over again till they have learned the sought after behavior, the behavior that you want them to perform in the end without your interference.
Also go to:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6zS7v9nSpo


What both Classical and Operant conditioning have in common is that is works through association.  In Classical conditioning you associate (pair with) the stimulus to a response. Operant conditioning work by pairing, associating the RESPONSE with a STIMULUS. In Operant conditioning we reverse the order of classical conditioning. Here we fist want the action before giving the stimulus, while in classical conditioning we first give the stimulus and then the response.

Operant conditioning then moves from:
Unconditioned response (UR) and Unconditioned stimulus (US), that is before the subject makes the association or pairing
 UR and Conditioned Stimulus (CS) the subject is aware that they receive a reward for their behavior, but it is not yet clear exactly what behavior is being rewarded.
Conditioned response (CR) and CS: the subject is aware that if they tell you that they want to go to the toilet to go potty, they will receive a sweaty, and so the new behavior has been learned. 
As a diagram it would look like this:
UR                      and                       US
UR                     and                        CS
CR                       to                           CS



The combination of classical and operant conditioning in turn laid the foundations for modeling. Modeling makes use of the concepts of stimulus and response, but incorporates with it the ideas of positive and negative reinforcement. We also no longer speak of purely response stimulus/reward and action behavior, but rather in terms of motivations i.e. extrinsic (external) and intrinsic (internal) rewards.

If you wish me to go into more detail regarding modeling please leave me a comment and I will do so.
Best regards,
Mr. Keyser

Rough Zulu translation: 
LP abafundi Dear: 
Kusukela nginikele wena incazelo emfushane conditioning classical I manje ubuye anikeze incazelo conditioning operant: 
Ngo conditioning Operant, (ngokungafani in conditioning zakudala), umgomo we ukuguqulwa yokuziphatha uwukufunda subject (umuntu noma isilwane) ukuziphatha okusha. Conditioning Operant kusekelwe embonweni wokuthi ufisa ukwandisa nobuningi ie inani izikhathi ku imali inikezwe isikhathi ngendaba ephinda ukuziphatha ufisa khona ukuba ufunde. Ngokwesibonelo: Imali izikhathi wakho ngonyaka 2 ubudala ikutshela bedinga ukuya ethoyilethi in ngeviki owanikwa, njengoba appose kuze inani izikhathi ekhohlwa. Lo mgomo ukuphela ke kube potty aqeqeshe kubo. Ngamanye amazwi, ufisa ukuba chance wayefuna action bese uyazama futhi bathole ngokweyame ukuphinda it ngokuphindaphindiwe kuze baye bafunda le babefuna emva yokuziphatha, ukuziphatha ofuna ukuba enze ekugcineni ngaphandle kokuphazanyiswa wakho. 

Okunye futhi iya ku: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6zS7v9nSpo 

What kokubili conditioning Classical futhi Operant abafana wukuthi kuba imisebenzi nge association. In conditioning Classical wena uzihlanganise (pair ne) lesi izisebenzi ukuba impendulo. Operant conditioning umsebenzi ukubhanqa, ukuzihlanganisa Impendulo ne umfutho. In conditioning Operant thina banqobe oda conditioning zasendulo. Lapha isibhakela bafuna isenzo ngaphambi kokunikeza umfutho, kanti ngo conditioning zakudala siqala ukunikeza izisebenzi futhi ke impendulo. 

Conditioning Operant ke uya kumfundzi
Ukusabela Unconditioned (UR) kanye umfutho Unconditioned (US), okusho ukuthi ngaphambi ngendaba yenza association noma yokuvumelanisa 
  Uri Stimulus moya (CS) ngendaba uyazi ukuthi uthola umvuzo ngokuziphatha kwabo, kodwa kungakabi kucacile kahle hle ukuziphatha zithola nomvuzo. 
Ukusabela moya (CR) no CS: ngendaba uyazi ukuthi uma bekutshela ukuthi ufuna ukuya endlini encane ukuze uhambe potty, bayothola a Sweaty, ngakho ukuziphatha amasha wafunda. 
Njengoba umfanekiso ukuthi kwakuyoba ibukeke lokhu: 
Uri and US 
Uri and CS 
CR kuya CS 


Ukuhlangana conditioning zakudala operant kona wabeka izisekelo ze Sokuzenzela. Sokuzenzela kwenza ukusetshenziswa imiqondo of umfutho kanye Ukusabela, kodwa sihlanganisa nalo imicabango ukuqinisa emihle nemibi. Siphinde akabange ikhuluma kuphela Ukusabela umfutho / umvuzo nemnyakato nokuziphatha, kodwa kunalokho ngokoMthetho izisusa ie extrinsic (bangaphandle) kanye eziwumgogodla (yangaphakathi) nemivuzo. 


Uma ufisa kimi ukungena imininingwane eyengeziwe Sokuzenzela sicela ushiye mina okuthile kuvele ngiyokwenza kanjalo. 

Ozithobayo, 

Friday, 26 October 2012

Classical Conditioning

I had a question today about classical conditioning.
All conditioning is a form of behavior modification. Classical conditioning seeks to increase the intensity of an already existing behavior, (unlike operant conditioning that increases the frequency i.e. the amount of times that a behavior occurs). In classical conditioning behavior is modified through paring an unconditioned stimulus (US) and unconditioned response  (US) to a conditioning stimulant (CS) to eventually get a conditioned response (CR).
US                      UR
Food makes you drool.  
US/CS                UR
Food with bell, you drool.
CS                    CR
 A Bell ring, there is no food, but you still drool.
Your behavior has now been modified in such a way that we have increased the intensity with which you drools. In other words, you now not only drool when you see food, but also when you hear the bell.








Now there are other elements that also come into play:
Generalization: You start to drool whenever you hear any bell, not only the one used to condition you. This is normally how phobias work. You are frightened once when you saw a Black Widow spider, that fear spread with time that eventually you are afraid of all spiders. an good example of this is the experiment of little Albert:



This is basically how one acquires a phobia.

Extinction: If there has not been any attempt to continue behavior modification, then that behavior will disappear with time.
Spontaneous return: Sometimes, after a long period of not being exposed to conditioning, and after the behavior that was modified had become extinct, the conditioned response may return spontaneously i.e. for no reason or randomly.

It is very important to note that both classical and operant conditioning form part of modeling and that in none of these do we speak of punishment. Punishment is when your only focus is to stop a behavior, not to modify it.
I hope this has helped some of you and please feel free to comment or ask questions if needed.
Regards,
Mr. Keyser
Rough Zulu translation:
Kwadingeka umbuzo namuhla mayelana conditioning zobuciko. 
Konke conditioning kuwuhlobo oluthile ukuguqulwa yokuziphatha. Conditioning Classical uhlose ukwandisa ukushuba i ukuziphatha okhona kakade, (akufani conditioning operant ukuthi kwandisa nobuningi ie inani izikhathi ukuthi ukuziphatha kwenzeka). In classic conditioning ukuziphatha is modified ngokusebenzisa paring i umfutho unconditioned (US) kanye Ukusabela unconditioned (US) kuya ivuselela conditioning (CS) kuya ekugcineni uthole impendulo moya (CR). 
US UR 
Ukudla ikwenza drool. 
US / CS UR 
Ukudla ne bell, nawe drool. 
CS CR 
  A Bell ring, kungekho ukudla, kepha wena namanje drool. 
Ukuziphatha yakho manje modified ngendlela yokuthi siye sanda umfutho esikhuluma ngalo drools. Ngamanye amazwi, manje drool hhayi kuphela lapho ubona ukudla, kodwa futhi uma uzwa insimbi. 

Kukhona nezinye izakhi ukuthi nako kuyadingeka
Isimiso: uqala drool noma nini uzwa noma yikuphi insimbi, hhayi kuphela kulowo asetshenziselwa sesimweni kuwe. Lokhu ngokuvamile zokwesaba asebenze kanjani. Nina bethukile once uma ubona spider Black Umfelokazi, ukwesaba basakaza ngokuhamba kwesikhathi ukuthi ekugcineni wena besaba wonke spider. isibonelo esihle salokhu imizamo ka Albert little: 

Lena ngokuyisisekelo kanjani izuza yokwesaba. 
Ukuqothulwa: Uma akubanga kukhona uma bezama ukuqhubeka ukuguqulwa ukuziphatha ke ukuthi ukuziphatha kuyoshabalala ngokuhamba kwesikhathi. 
Return okuzenzakalelayo: Ngezinye izikhathi, emva kwesikhathi eside akukhona ekuvezweni conditioning, futhi emva ukuziphatha kwaba modified zase ziphela nyĆ”, ukusabela moya angase abuyele ngokuzenzekelayo okungukuthi ngaphandle kwesizathu noma ngezikhathi. 

Kubalulekile ukwazi ukuthi kokubili zakudala operant ifomu conditioning ingxenye Sokuzenzela nokuthi akekho lokhu sikhuluma ukujeziswa. Isijeziso Yilapho kugxilwa sakho sodwa ukuyeka ukuziphatha, hhayi ukushintsha kukho. 
Bhekafuthi: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpoLxEN54ho 
Ngiyathemba lokhu isize abanye benu futhi sicela ukhululeke ukuphawula noma buza imibuzo uma sidingeka. 
Mayelana-
Mnu Keyser